Ο Πούτιν ειρωνεύεται τους Δυτικούς: «Τι ώρα θα γινόταν η εισβολή στην Ουκρανία;»

[Προέλλην]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1624137718665031682

πουτλερική μέηνστρημ τιβί. Τους πιο παρανοϊκους ΕΛ ακροδεξιούς να βάλεις να λένε τα δικά τους, θα φαντάζουν νορμάλ άνθρωποι συγκριτικά.

[Perseus1966]

The Internet Research Agency (IRA; Russian: Агентство интернет-исследований, romanized: Agentstvo internet-issledovaniy), also known as Glavset (Russian: Главсеть)[1] and known in Russian Internet slang as the Trolls from Olgino (Russian: ольгинские тролли), is a Russian company engaged in online propaganda and influence operations on behalf of Russian business and political interests. It is linked to Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin and based in Saint Petersburg, Russia.

The agency has employed fake accounts registered on major social networking sites, discussion boards, online newspaper sites, and video hosting services to promote the Kremlin's interests in domestic and foreign policy including Ukraine and the Middle East as well as attempting to influence the 2016 United States presidential election. More than 1,000 employees reportedly worked in a single building of the agency in 2015.

In the beginning of April 2014 there began an organized online campaign to shift public opinion in the Western world in a way that would be useful for Russian authorities regarding the Russian military intervention in Ukraine in 2014. Hacked and leaked documents from that time contain instructions for commenters posting at the websites of Fox News, The Huffington Post, TheBlaze, Politico, and WorldNetDaily.

The requirement for the working hours for the trolls is also mentioned: 50 comments under news articles per day. Each blogger has to manage six accounts on Facebook, post at least three posts every day, and participate twice in the group discussions. Other employees have to manage 10 accounts on Twitter, publishing 50 tweets every day. Journalists concluded that Igor Osadchiy was a probable leader of the project, and the campaign itself was run by Internet Research Agency Ltd. Osadchiy denied his connection to the agency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency

Russian web brigades (also called Russian trolls, Russian bots, Kremlin Bots, Kremlins or Rustapar) are state-sponsored anonymous Internet political commentators and trolls linked to the Government of Russia. Participants report that they are organized into teams and groups of commentators that participate in Russian and international political blogs and Internet forums using sockpuppets, social bots and large-scale orchestrated trolling and disinformation campaigns to promote pro-Putin and pro-Russian propaganda.

Articles on the Russian Wikipedia concerning the MH17 crash and the Russo-Ukrainian War were targeted by Russian internet propaganda outlets. In June 2019 a group of 12 editors introducing coordinated pro-government and anti-opposition bias was blocked on the Russian-language Wikipedia. During the war by Russia against Ukraine in 2022, Kremlin trolls were still active on many social platforms and were spreading disinformation related to the war events.

Kremlin trolls are closely tied to the Internet Research Agency, a Saint Petersburg-based company run by Yevgeny Prigozhin, who is a close ally to Vladimir Putin and head of the mercenary Wagner Group, known for committing war crimes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_web_brigades

Αυτοί που μας ποστάρει ο Περσέας είναι

Μονο που οτι ποσταρω εγω ειναι 100% ακριβες ,οπως επισης πρωτος εχω βαλει τις αποτυχιες των ρωσσων.

[pluton]

https://youtu.be/d69T7rzIabI

[Προέλλην]

The scenes are chaotic: Russian tanks veering wildly before exploding or driving straight into minefields, men running in every direction, some on fire, the bodies of soldiers caught in tank tracks.

Russian military bloggers are calling it a fiasco, and worse.

These scenes have been recorded by Ukrainian military drones over the past two weeks around the town of Vuhledar in Donetsk, eastern Ukraine, where successive Russian assaults have failed.

The Vuhledar debacle suggests chronic failures in the command and tactics of the Russians as they gear up for a spring offensive. If replicated elsewhere on the long military front in Donetsk and Luhansk, such failings could jeopardize the Kremlin’s plans to seize more territory.

About 20 videos geolocated by CNN show basic tactical blunders in an area that’s open and flat, where Ukrainian spotters on higher ground can direct artillery strikes and where minefields are worsening Russian casualties.

One video shows a tank running into a minefield and exploding, followed almost obliviously by an infantry fighting vehicle that suffers the same fate. Others show Ukrainian drones dropping small explosive charges on static tanks in open country – and a graveyard of abandoned armor.

At least two dozen Russian tanks and infantry vehicles have been disabled or destroyed in a matter of days, according to the videos, which were released by the Ukrainian military and analyzed by CNN and military experts. Satellite images show intensive patterns of impacts along tree lines where Russian tanks tried to advance.

The Russian Defense Ministry has insisted the assault on Vuhledar, where the 155th Marine Brigade is prominently involved, is going according to plan. In remarks recorded for a Sunday television show, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the “marine infantry is working as it should. Right now. Fighting heroically.”

But the leader of the self-declared, Russian-backed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Denis Pushilin, acknowledged Friday that the area was “hot” and said “the enemy continues to transfer reserves in large quantities, and this slowed down the liberation of this settlement.”

Vuhledar was built for the nearby coal mine (the name translates as “gift of coal”) and sits above surrounding plains. Its high-rise buildings give its defenders – principally the Ukrainian 72nd Mechanized – a significant advantage, as well as hardened underground cover.

Military historian Tom Cooper, who has studied the battle for Vuhledar, describes it as “a big, tall fortress in the middle of an empty, flat desert.”

The town has become a lynchpin in the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been trying to take it for three months. Victory for Moscow here would make it harder for the Ukrainians to shut down a nearby railroad that links Donetsk with Russian-occupied Crimea and allow the Russians to begin a northern “hook” as part of their anticipated spring offensive.

A previously ill-conceived plan in November to take Vuhledar led to heavy casualties and a near mutiny among men of the 155th Marine Brigade.

Critics of Russia’s military high command say the handling of the latest offensive is worse still, with one military blogger describing it as a “shameful debacle.”

Cooper says the Russians built a formidable force around Vuhledar, “say, a total of about 20,000 troops, 90 MBTs [main battle tanks], perhaps two times as many IFVs [infantry fighting vehicles], and about 100 artillery pieces.”

But attacks launched in the last week of January were fatally flawed, he said. “They were advancing along a relatively narrow route, all the time in sight of Ukrainian observers posted atop of high buildings in Vuhledar, and now facing about 500 meters of empty terrain on the eastern side of the town,” Cooper wrote on his blog.

“Ukrainian artillery not only caused heavy losses to the advancing units but hit their rear too – cutting off both their supply links and their possible withdrawal routes.”

‘Only morons attack head-on’

A number of prominent Russian military bloggers have been unrestrained in their criticism of the Vuhledar offensive.

“They were shot like turkeys at a shooting range,” said former DPR Defense Minister Igor Strelkov, who has become a strident critic of the campaign.

Strelkov, also known as Igor Girkin, added on Telegram that “a lot of good T-72B3/T-80BVM tanks and the best paratroopers and marines were liquidated.”

In another post on Telegram, Strelkov wrote: “Only morons attack head-on in the same place, heavily fortified and extremely inconvenient for the attackers for many months in a row.”

Russia’s military bloggers have tens and sometimes hundreds of thousands of subscribers to their Telegram channels. They have been highly critical of previous episodes in the campaign.

One of them – Moscow Calling – said at the weekend that the movement of tanks and infantry fighting vehicles in “slender columns” near Vuhledar was asking for trouble. He alleged that Russian units in the area lack information because commanders have failed to integrate intelligence-gathering into battlefield decisions.

By contrast, he said: “All this has been implemented or is in the process of being implemented by the Ukrainian armed forces.”

Moscow Calling asserted that older T-72 tanks deployed in Vuhledar lack upgrades that would improve the driver’s breadth of vision. That may help explain several instances in which Russian tanks seemed to get entangled or reverse blindly.

“How are blind, deaf tanks, armored personnel carriers, with equally blind, deaf infantry supposed to fight without columns? And then how to coordinate any actions if there is no communication and situational awareness?” he wrote.

“If the Russian Armed Forces try to disperse, they will shoot each other, because they do not understand who is in front of them.”

Several Russian commentators have called for the dismissal of Lieutenant General Rustam Muradov, the commander of the Eastern Grouping of Forces. Muradov was in charge in November when men of the 155th protested that his tactics had caused disastrous losses.

Another blogger said that Russian forces were doomed to repeat their mistakes if such commanders remained in place.

In an expletive-laden post, the pro-Wagner Telegram channel Grey Zone said of Muradov: “This coward is lying down at the control point and sending column after column until the commander of one of the brigades involved in the Vuhledar assault is dead on the contact line.”

The commander killed was a special forces colonel, Sergey Polyakov, according to unofficial Russian sources.

Another Russian blog with more than 500,000 followers said of Muradov’s team: “These people killed a significant number of personnel and equipment [in November] and did not bear any responsibility. After which, with the same mediocrity, they began to storm Ugledar [Vuhledar]. Impunity always breeds permissiveness.”

Questions over troop training

But the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) says that poor leadership is only part of the problem: the “highly dysfunctional tactics are far more indicative of the fact that the 155th Naval Infantry Brigade is likely comprised of poorly trained mobilized personnel than of poor command.”

The UK defense ministry reported Sunday that an uptick in Russian casualties in places like Vuhledar “is likely due to a range of factors including lack of trained personnel, coordination, and resources across the front.”

Ukrainian military officials say there is a random mix of Russian forces in the Vuhledar area, including professional units, the recently mobilized, militia of the DPR and infantry of a private military company called Patriot, which is said to be close to the Russian defense ministry.

The setbacks around Vuhledar don’t bode well for a broader Russian offensive. ISW assesses that they “have likely further weakened the Russian ultranationalist community’s belief that Russian forces are able to launch a decisive offensive operation.”

However, some Ukrainian units have been running short of munitions as the tempo of Russian operations has increased.

“The key to success on the battlefield is effective fire damage, which requires an appropriate amount of weapons and ammunition,” said the commander of Ukrainian forces Valeriy Zaluzhnyi on Saturday.

Analysts say the challenge for the Ukrainians is to resupply frontline units with shells and anti-tank missiles fast enough.

Russian forces continue to have a distinct advantage in firepower. On Saturday they launched a barrage of thermobaric missiles at Vuhledar, a reminder that they are more capable of inflicting destruction than taking territory.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/13/euro ... index.html

O πουτλερικός στρατός δεν θυμίζει σε τίποτε σύγχρονο στρατό. Πρόκειται για κάτι ανάλογο του ιρανικού στρατού υπό των Μουλάδων στον πόλεμο με το Ιράκ. Πρόκειται για τριτοκοσμική εσχατότρυπα.

[pluton]

Κατάρριψη υπερσύγχρονου Su 35S στην περιοχή της Χερσωνας.

https://youtu.be/1zGH3SEIR-4

[Προέλλην]

Να καταστείλουν εχθρική αεράμυνα, δεν μπορούν.

Να αποκτήσουν αεροπορική υπεροχή, δεν μπορούν.

Να διεξάγουν μηχανοκίνητες επιχειρήσεις, δεν μπορούν.

Μπορούν όμως να στέλνουν ανεκπαίδευτους σε επιθέσεις κυμάτων, χωρίς οργάνωση, χωρίς σαφή εικόνα της τακτικής κατάστασης, κτλ. και να προχωρούν 1 χλμ την εβδομάδα. Και αυτό μέχρι να υποχωρήσουν στρατηγικά.

[Perseus1966]

Κατάρριψη υπερσύγχρονου Su 35S στην περιοχή της Χερσωνας.

https://youtu.be/1zGH3SEIR-4

Το βρηκαν λεει οχι το εριξαν

[Perseus1966]

The scenes are chaotic: Russian tanks veering wildly before exploding or driving straight into minefields, men running in every direction, some on fire, the bodies of soldiers caught in tank tracks.

Russian military bloggers are calling it a fiasco, and worse.

These scenes have been recorded by Ukrainian military drones over the past two weeks around the town of Vuhledar in Donetsk, eastern Ukraine, where successive Russian assaults have failed.

The Vuhledar debacle suggests chronic failures in the command and tactics of the Russians as they gear up for a spring offensive. If replicated elsewhere on the long military front in Donetsk and Luhansk, such failings could jeopardize the Kremlin’s plans to seize more territory.

About 20 videos geolocated by CNN show basic tactical blunders in an area that’s open and flat, where Ukrainian spotters on higher ground can direct artillery strikes and where minefields are worsening Russian casualties.

One video shows a tank running into a minefield and exploding, followed almost obliviously by an infantry fighting vehicle that suffers the same fate. Others show Ukrainian drones dropping small explosive charges on static tanks in open country – and a graveyard of abandoned armor.

At least two dozen Russian tanks and infantry vehicles have been disabled or destroyed in a matter of days, according to the videos, which were released by the Ukrainian military and analyzed by CNN and military experts. Satellite images show intensive patterns of impacts along tree lines where Russian tanks tried to advance.

The Russian Defense Ministry has insisted the assault on Vuhledar, where the 155th Marine Brigade is prominently involved, is going according to plan. In remarks recorded for a Sunday television show, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the “marine infantry is working as it should. Right now. Fighting heroically.”

But the leader of the self-declared, Russian-backed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Denis Pushilin, acknowledged Friday that the area was “hot” and said “the enemy continues to transfer reserves in large quantities, and this slowed down the liberation of this settlement.”

Vuhledar was built for the nearby coal mine (the name translates as “gift of coal”) and sits above surrounding plains. Its high-rise buildings give its defenders – principally the Ukrainian 72nd Mechanized – a significant advantage, as well as hardened underground cover.

Military historian Tom Cooper, who has studied the battle for Vuhledar, describes it as “a big, tall fortress in the middle of an empty, flat desert.”

The town has become a lynchpin in the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been trying to take it for three months. Victory for Moscow here would make it harder for the Ukrainians to shut down a nearby railroad that links Donetsk with Russian-occupied Crimea and allow the Russians to begin a northern “hook” as part of their anticipated spring offensive.

A previously ill-conceived plan in November to take Vuhledar led to heavy casualties and a near mutiny among men of the 155th Marine Brigade.

Critics of Russia’s military high command say the handling of the latest offensive is worse still, with one military blogger describing it as a “shameful debacle.”

Cooper says the Russians built a formidable force around Vuhledar, “say, a total of about 20,000 troops, 90 MBTs [main battle tanks], perhaps two times as many IFVs [infantry fighting vehicles], and about 100 artillery pieces.”

But attacks launched in the last week of January were fatally flawed, he said. “They were advancing along a relatively narrow route, all the time in sight of Ukrainian observers posted atop of high buildings in Vuhledar, and now facing about 500 meters of empty terrain on the eastern side of the town,” Cooper wrote on his blog.

“Ukrainian artillery not only caused heavy losses to the advancing units but hit their rear too – cutting off both their supply links and their possible withdrawal routes.”

‘Only morons attack head-on’

A number of prominent Russian military bloggers have been unrestrained in their criticism of the Vuhledar offensive.

“They were shot like turkeys at a shooting range,” said former DPR Defense Minister Igor Strelkov, who has become a strident critic of the campaign.

Strelkov, also known as Igor Girkin, added on Telegram that “a lot of good T-72B3/T-80BVM tanks and the best paratroopers and marines were liquidated.”

In another post on Telegram, Strelkov wrote: “Only morons attack head-on in the same place, heavily fortified and extremely inconvenient for the attackers for many months in a row.”

Russia’s military bloggers have tens and sometimes hundreds of thousands of subscribers to their Telegram channels. They have been highly critical of previous episodes in the campaign.

One of them – Moscow Calling – said at the weekend that the movement of tanks and infantry fighting vehicles in “slender columns” near Vuhledar was asking for trouble. He alleged that Russian units in the area lack information because commanders have failed to integrate intelligence-gathering into battlefield decisions.

By contrast, he said: “All this has been implemented or is in the process of being implemented by the Ukrainian armed forces.”

Moscow Calling asserted that older T-72 tanks deployed in Vuhledar lack upgrades that would improve the driver’s breadth of vision. That may help explain several instances in which Russian tanks seemed to get entangled or reverse blindly.

“How are blind, deaf tanks, armored personnel carriers, with equally blind, deaf infantry supposed to fight without columns? And then how to coordinate any actions if there is no communication and situational awareness?” he wrote.

“If the Russian Armed Forces try to disperse, they will shoot each other, because they do not understand who is in front of them.”

Several Russian commentators have called for the dismissal of Lieutenant General Rustam Muradov, the commander of the Eastern Grouping of Forces. Muradov was in charge in November when men of the 155th protested that his tactics had caused disastrous losses.

Another blogger said that Russian forces were doomed to repeat their mistakes if such commanders remained in place.

In an expletive-laden post, the pro-Wagner Telegram channel Grey Zone said of Muradov: “This coward is lying down at the control point and sending column after column until the commander of one of the brigades involved in the Vuhledar assault is dead on the contact line.”

The commander killed was a special forces colonel, Sergey Polyakov, according to unofficial Russian sources.

Another Russian blog with more than 500,000 followers said of Muradov’s team: “These people killed a significant number of personnel and equipment [in November] and did not bear any responsibility. After which, with the same mediocrity, they began to storm Ugledar [Vuhledar]. Impunity always breeds permissiveness.”

Questions over troop training

But the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) says that poor leadership is only part of the problem: the “highly dysfunctional tactics are far more indicative of the fact that the 155th Naval Infantry Brigade is likely comprised of poorly trained mobilized personnel than of poor command.”

The UK defense ministry reported Sunday that an uptick in Russian casualties in places like Vuhledar “is likely due to a range of factors including lack of trained personnel, coordination, and resources across the front.”

Ukrainian military officials say there is a random mix of Russian forces in the Vuhledar area, including professional units, the recently mobilized, militia of the DPR and infantry of a private military company called Patriot, which is said to be close to the Russian defense ministry.

The setbacks around Vuhledar don’t bode well for a broader Russian offensive. ISW assesses that they “have likely further weakened the Russian ultranationalist community’s belief that Russian forces are able to launch a decisive offensive operation.”

However, some Ukrainian units have been running short of munitions as the tempo of Russian operations has increased.

“The key to success on the battlefield is effective fire damage, which requires an appropriate amount of weapons and ammunition,” said the commander of Ukrainian forces Valeriy Zaluzhnyi on Saturday.

Analysts say the challenge for the Ukrainians is to resupply frontline units with shells and anti-tank missiles fast enough.

Russian forces continue to have a distinct advantage in firepower. On Saturday they launched a barrage of thermobaric missiles at Vuhledar, a reminder that they are more capable of inflicting destruction than taking territory.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/13/euro ... index.html

O πουτλερικός στρατός δεν θυμίζει σε τίποτε σύγχρονο στρατό. Πρόκειται για κάτι ανάλογο του ιρανικού στρατού υπό των Μουλάδων στον πόλεμο με το Ιράκ. Πρόκειται για τριτοκοσμική εσχατότρυπα.

Οσες φορες και να το γραψετε για μια μετραει ,το ξερετε υποθετω...

[pluton]

Κατάρριψη υπερσύγχρονου Su 35S στην περιοχή της Χερσωνας.

https://youtu.be/1zGH3SEIR-4

Το βρηκαν λεει οχι το εριξαν

Υπάρχουν φωτογραφίες, πέρα από αυτό είχαν ανακοινώσει την πτώση του και τώρα το βρήκαν, δεν φύτρωσε στις απέραντες πεδιάδες της Χερσωνας.

[Προέλλην]

Ο Γιεβγκένι Πριγκόζιν, ο επικεφαλής της ρωσικής μισθοφορικής εταιρείας Wagner, παραδέχθηκε σήμερα, ότι ίδρυσε και χρηματοδοτούσε το «Πρακτορείο Διαδικτυακών Ερευνών», μια εταιρεία την οποία η Ουάσιγκτον είχε χαρακτηρίσει ως «φάμπρικα των τρολς», η οποία παρενέβαινε στις αμερικανικές εκλογές του 2016.

Ο Πριγκόζιν, σύμμαχος του Ρώσου προέδρου Βλαντίμιρ Πούτιν, πέρασε χρόνια ενεργώντας για λογαριασμό και στη σκιά του Κρεμλίνου, αλλά αναδείχθηκε τους τελευταίους μήνες ως ένα από τα πιο προβεβλημένα πρόσωπα που συνδέονται με την εισβολή της Ρωσίας στην Ουκρανία.

Έχει παραδεχτεί στο παρελθόν ότι παρενέβη στις αμερικανικές εκλογές, αλλά οι σημερινές του δηλώσεις δείχνουν ότι προχωράει περισσότερο καθώς περιγράφει συγκεκριμένα την σχέση του με το Πρακτορείο Διαδικτυακών Ερευνών (IRA) που έχει την έδρα του στην Αγία Πετρούπολη.

«Δεν ήμουν ποτέ απλώς ο χρηματοδότης του Πρακτορείου Διαδικτυακών Ερευνών. Εγώ το σκέφτηκα, εγώ το δημιούργησα, εγώ το διηύθυνα για μεγάλο χρονικό διάστημα» δήλωσε ο Πριγκόζιν σε μια ανάρτηση του στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης την οποία κοινοποίησε η δική του εταιρεία κέτερινγκ Concord.

«Δημιουργήθηκε για να προστατεύσει τον ρωσικό πληροφοριακό χώρο από την άξεστη και επιθετική αντιρωσική προπαγάνδα της Δύσης» δήλωσε ο Πριγκόζιν.

Στον Πριγκόζιν επιβλήθηκαν για πρώτη φορά κυρώσεις από τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες για τις σχέσεις του με το Πρακτορείο Διαδικτυακών Ερευνών το 2018 και του απαγγέλθηκαν κατηγορίες για συνωμοσία με σκοπό την εξαπάτηση των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών.

Η έκθεση του ειδικού εισαγγελέα Ρόμπερτ Μίλερ σχετικά με την έρευνά του για τον ρόλο της Ρωσίας στις αμερικανικές εκλογές του 2016 ανέφερε ότι το Πρακτορείο Διαδικτυακών Ερευνών επεδίωκε να σπείρει τη διχόνοια στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες μέσω του «πληροφοριακού πολέμου».

Επιδίωξε να επηρεάσει τις εκλογές του 2016 υπέρ του Τραμπ, αναφέρεται στην έκθεση του Μίλερ.

«Η εκστρατεία εξελίχθηκε από ένα γενικευμένο πρόγραμμα που σχεδιάστηκε το 2014 και το 2015 για να υπονομεύσει το εκλογικό σύστημα των ΗΠΑ, σε μια στοχευμένη επιχείρηση που από τις αρχές του 2016 ευνοούσε τον υποψήφιο Τραμπ και υποτιμούσε την υποψήφια Κλίντον», αναφέρεται στην έκθεση.

«Οι υπάλληλοι του Πρακτορείου Διαδικτυακών Ερευνών ταξίδευαν επίσης στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες σε αποστολές συλλογής πληροφοριών».

Ο Πριγκόζιν, ο οποίος πέρασε την τελευταία δεκαετία της Σοβιετικής Ένωσης στη φυλακή για ληστεία και απάτη, ήταν επί χρόνια συνεργάτης του Πούτιν. Η εταιρεία κέτερινγκ που διαθέτει η οποία είχε σαρώσει τις κυβερνητικές συμβάσεις, του εξασφάλισε το παρατσούκλι «σεφ του Πούτιν», ενώ έστελνε μισθοφόρους της Wagner να πολεμήσουν μαζί με Ρώσους στρατιώτες στη Συρία και σε συγκρούσεις σε όλη την Αφρική με σκοπό να προωθήσει τα γεωπολιτικά συμφέροντα της Ρωσίας.

Μετά από χρόνια αρνήσεων, παραδέχθηκε πέρυσι τη σχέση του με την μισθοφορική εταιρεία Wagner και δήλωσε ότι παρενέβη στις αμερικανικές εκλογές.

Έχοντας χτίσει μέσα σε σύντομο χρονικό διάστημα το δημόσιο προφίλ του τόσο στη Ρωσία όσο και στο εξωτερικό μετά την εισβολή της Ρωσίας στην Ουκρανία, οι αναλυτές λένε ότι το Κρεμλίνο πρόσφατα αποφάσισε να του κόψει τα φτερά, ανησυχώντας για το αυξανόμενο κύρος του ως ειλικρινής (σκληρός) επιχειρηματίας και την σκληρή κριτική που ασκούσε στο υπουργείο Άμυνας.

ΑΠΕ-ΜΠΕ